1-1H · 巩固 Consolidate

Consolidation - Success Criteria Checklist巩固复习 - 成功标准自查清单

做得好!用这份成功标准清单逐项检查你在 1-1 单元真正掌握了哪些技能。Good job! Use this success-criteria checklist to confirm exactly which skills you have mastered in Unit 1-1.

阅读约 6 分钟~6 min read 4 个练习4 exercises 5 条达标标准5 success criteria

学习目标 · Learning Goals

  • 1
    Review and self-assess the key skills learned in Unit 1-1 on perspective and bias.
    回顾并自评 1-1 单元关于视角与偏见的核心技能。
  • 2
    Identify which success criteria you have met and which still need work.
    辨明哪些成功标准已达成、哪些还需加强。
本课定位About this page

What is a Success Criteria Checklist? 什么是「成功标准清单」?

线索 · 这不是新内容,而是把整单元的能力目标列成一张可勾选的清单,帮你自查。Cue · This is not new content; it lists the unit's skill goals as a checkable list so you can self-assess.
EN

Good job with the lesson! you did well! Lets check the skills you have learned:

中文

这节课完成得很好!现在我们来检查一下你已经学到的技能。

这一页是 1-1 透视 / Perspectives 单元的总结(consolidation)。它把整个单元的学习目标整理成一份「我能……(I can…)」的成功标准清单。请逐条对照,诚实地判断自己是否真正做到。能做到的打勾,做不到的回到对应小节重新学习。

讲解：「成功标准(success criteria)」回答的是「学到什么程度才算学会」。把它当作复习的路线图,而不是走过场。Note: "Success criteria" answer the question "how well do I need to do it to count as learned?" Treat the list as a revision road map, not a formality.
技能一:视角与偏见Skill set 1: perspective & bias

Reading for perspective and bias 读出作者视角与偏见

线索 · 前四条都围绕「看穿文本背后的人」:作者立场、叙述视角、偏见,以及偏见背后的信念与权力。Cue · The first four items all centre on "seeing the person behind the text": authorial stance, narrative perspective, bias, and the beliefs and power behind that bias.
EN
  • I can read a variety of written text to determine the authorial perspectiveauthorial perspective 作者视角：真实作者对话题的立场、态度与倾向。
  • I can identify different types of narrative perspectives
  • I can identify biasbias 偏见：文本对某一方有意或无意的倾向,使呈现不够中立。 evident in texts
  • I can explain how bias reflects specific beliefs, values, identities and power
中文
  • 我能阅读各种书面文本,判断出作者的视角(authorial perspective)
  • 我能识别不同类型的叙述视角(narrative perspectives)
  • 我能识别文本中明显存在的偏见(bias)
  • 我能解释偏见如何反映出特定的信念、价值观、身份认同与权力(beliefs, values, identities and power)

这四条层层递进:先认出「谁在说」(作者视角)、再认出「用什么人称在讲」(叙述视角),然后发现文本「偏向哪一边」(偏见),最后追问「这种偏向背后藏着谁的立场与权力」。

讲解：区分两个易混词:authorial perspective 是真实作者的立场态度;narrative perspective 是叙述使用的人称视角(第一/第三人称、有限/全知)。两者不是一回事。Note: Distinguish two easily confused terms: authorial perspective is the real author's stance; narrative perspective is the point of view used to tell the story (first/third person, limited/omniscient). They are not the same thing.
技能二:标点规范Skill set 2: punctuation

Using punctuation accurately 准确使用标点符号

线索 · 本单元也练了一组进阶标点;能正确使用它们是写作清晰的基础。Cue · The unit also practised a set of advanced punctuation marks; using them correctly is the basis of clear writing.
EN
  • I can use hyphens, apostrophes, quotation marks, dashes, semi-colons, and ellipses
中文
  • 我能正确使用连字符(hyphens)、撇号(apostrophes)、引号(quotation marks)、破折号(dashes)、分号(semi-colons)和省略号(ellipses)

这些标点在中文里有的不常用或用法不同,容易出错。建议各举一个自己写的例句来检验是否真的会用。

讲解：注意 hyphen(连字符 -,连接词,如 well-known)和 dash(破折号 — 或 –,分隔句子成分)是不同符号,长度和用途都不一样。Note: Note that a hyphen (-, joins words, e.g. well-known) and a dash (— or –, separates parts of a sentence) are different marks with different lengths and uses.
技能三:新闻偏见分析Skill set 3: bias in the news

Analysing bias in news stories 分析新闻报道中的偏见

线索 · 最后三条把技能用到真实媒介上:认出新闻里的偏见、预判读者反应、看穿新闻如何被操纵。Cue · The last three items apply the skills to real media: spotting bias in the news, predicting reader reactions, and seeing how news is manipulated.
EN
  • I can identify and explain the bias in new stories
  • I can explain the expected reaction anticipated by news stories
  • I can explain how news stories have been manipulated to reflect specific beliefs, values, identities and power
中文
  • 我能识别并解释新闻报道(news stories)中的偏见
  • 我能解释新闻报道预期引发的读者反应(expected reaction)
  • 我能解释新闻报道如何被操纵(manipulated),以反映特定的信念、价值观、身份认同与权力

这是把「视角与偏见」的抽象技能落到真实的媒介素养上:好的读者不只读懂新闻说了什么,更读得出它想让你怎么想、又是怎么做到的。

【待核】原文 "new stories" 疑为 "news stories" 的笔误,此处按「新闻报道」理解。

讲解：媒介素养的核心不是「这条新闻是真是假」,而是「它用什么手法引导我的情绪和判断」。每读一条新闻,试着问:它想让我对谁产生好感或反感?Note: The core of media literacy is not "is this news true or false?" but "what techniques is it using to steer my emotions and judgement?" For each story, ask: who does it want me to like or dislike?

总结 / Summary

这页是 1-1 单元的成功标准自查清单,涵盖视角、偏见、标点与新闻媒介素养。This page is the success-criteria checklist for Unit 1-1, covering perspective, bias, punctuation, and news media literacy.

1

辨析 authorial perspective(作者视角) 与 narrative perspective(叙述视角) 的区别。Distinguish authorial perspective from narrative perspective.

2

能识别文本与新闻中的 bias(偏见),并解释它如何反映特定信念、价值观、身份与权力。Identify bias in texts and news, and explain how it reflects specific beliefs, values, identities and power.

3

能正确使用连字符、撇号、引号、破折号、分号、省略号等进阶标点。Use advanced punctuation correctly: hyphens, apostrophes, quotation marks, dashes, semi-colons, ellipses.

4

能看穿新闻被 manipulated(操纵) 的方式,并预判其想引发的读者反应——这是 media literacy(媒介素养) 的核心。See through how news is manipulated and predict the reader reaction it anticipates - the heart of media literacy.

知识点清单 · Knowledge Points

authorial perspectivenarrative perspectivebiasmedia literacypunctuation
?

随堂练习Exercises

先自己作答，再展开参考答案核对。Answer first, then reveal to check.

练习 1Q1选择题 · Multiple Choice

下列哪一项描述的是 narrative perspective(叙述视角) 而不是 authorial perspective(作者视角)?Which of the following describes narrative perspective rather than authorial perspective?

B 描述的是讲述所用的人称和视野(第一人称、有限视角),属于叙述视角。A、C、D 都在讲真实作者的立场态度,属于作者视角。B describes the person and scope used to tell the story (first person, limited view), which is narrative perspective. A, C and D all describe the real author's stance, which is authorial perspective.
练习 2Q2选择题 · Multiple Choice

根据本单元,分析新闻报道偏见时,最核心的提问是?According to this unit, what is the most central question when analysing bias in a news story?

媒介素养关注的是新闻如何被操纵、想引发怎样的读者反应,而不只是真伪或表面信息。因此 C 最切合本单元成功标准。Media literacy focuses on how news is manipulated and what reader reaction it anticipates, not just truth or surface details. So C best matches the unit's success criteria.
练习 3Q3简答题 · Short Answer

用你自己的话解释:为什么说「识别偏见」之后还要进一步「解释偏见反映了哪些信念、价值观与权力」?In your own words, explain why, after "identifying bias", we must go further and "explain which beliefs, values and power the bias reflects".

参考答案

识别偏见只是发现文本偏向某一方;但偏见从来不是凭空产生的,它背后站着某种立场、利益或权力关系。只有进一步追问「这种偏向服务于谁的信念和利益」,才能真正理解文本为什么这样写、谁从中获益,从而成为有批判力的读者,而不是被动接受。

Identifying bias only means noticing that a text leans one way; but bias never appears from nowhere - it rests on a stance, interest or power relation. Only by asking further "whose beliefs and interests does this slant serve" can we truly understand why the text is written this way and who benefits, and so become critical readers rather than passive recipients.

练习 4Q4简答题 · Short Answer

从清单的六种标点(连字符、撇号、引号、破折号、分号、省略号)中任选两种,各写一个正确使用的英文例句。Choose any two of the six punctuation marks in the list (hyphen, apostrophe, quotation marks, dash, semi-colon, ellipsis) and write one correct English example sentence for each.

参考答案

示例(答案不唯一):

  • 分号 semi-colon:The news was clearly biased; every quote came from one side.
  • 破折号 dash:Only one thing mattered to the editor — the headline.

关键是分号连接两个关系紧密的完整句子,破折号用于强调或插入信息。

Examples (answers will vary):

  • Semi-colon: The news was clearly biased; every quote came from one side.
  • Dash: Only one thing mattered to the editor — the headline.

The key point is that a semi-colon joins two closely related complete sentences, while a dash adds emphasis or an interruption.

✓

达标标准Success Criteria

进入下一节之前，确认你已掌握以下各点。Before moving on, confirm you can do each of the following.

Self-check

勾选你已经做到的项目，进度会自动保存。Tick what you can do; progress saves automatically.